Best Known (52, 89, s)-Nets in Base 16
(52, 89, 528)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 89, 528)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 90, 528)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 45, 264)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 263)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 45, 264)-net over F256, using
(52, 89, 921)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (52, 89, 921)-net over F16, using
(52, 89, 388004)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 89, 388005)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 88, 388005)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 9174 214023 560780 911691 257373 608024 183525 981271 180771 682387 062622 856148 202369 272730 289497 837005 362014 911476 > 1688 [i]