Best Known (27, 90, s)-Nets in Base 16
(27, 90, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 90, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 90, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(27, 90, 104)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(27, 90, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
(27, 90, 156)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (27, 90, 156)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 156, using
(27, 90, 2353)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 90, 2354)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 89, 2354)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 146855 211944 589192 937714 071698 783616 398438 178440 425645 711550 739536 265742 530389 086362 944805 312662 274200 862736 > 1689 [i]