Best Known (42, 90, s)-Nets in Base 16
(42, 90, 225)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 90, 225)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 90, 225)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 224)-sequence over F16, using
(42, 90, 238)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (42, 90, 238)-net over F16, using
(42, 90, 257)-Net in Base 16
(42, 90, 257)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (12, 60, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
(42, 90, 21402)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 90, 21403)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 351001 047171 784286 148765 283514 220192 342577 436592 607366 036046 765692 790675 085974 286274 618912 430720 603113 165181 > 1690 [i]