Best Known (53, 90, s)-Nets in Base 16
(53, 90, 530)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 90, 530)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 45, 265)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 264)-sequence over F256, using
(53, 90, 1026)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (53, 90, 1026)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 45, 513)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- K1,1 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
(53, 90, 452620)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 90, 452621)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 89, 452621)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 146789 086210 651022 353403 594462 668495 094735 520389 871146 389776 849087 909652 869701 836347 022346 468894 402886 820096 > 1689 [i]