Best Known (55, 90, s)-Nets in Base 16
(55, 90, 552)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 90, 552)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 20, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (35, 70, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (3, 20, 38)-net over F16, using
(55, 90, 1406)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (55, 90, 1406)-net over F16, using
(55, 90, 963323)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 90, 963324)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (55, 89, 963324)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 146785 566215 740746 042743 449234 296093 242568 938023 655624 204993 934278 733467 249454 834453 119848 126285 716047 775121 > 1689 [i]