Best Known (56, 90, s)-Nets in Base 16
(56, 90, 563)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 90, 563)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 22, 49)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 48)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 48)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (34, 68, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 34, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 34, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (5, 22, 49)-net over F16, using
(56, 90, 1704)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (56, 90, 1704)-net over F16, using
(56, 90, 1133974)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 90, 1133975)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 348559 211863 899907 578029 984270 025382 902600 288423 397673 196937 220112 835997 443137 161093 810762 231993 809440 918626 > 1690 [i]