Best Known (56, 92, s)-Nets in Base 16
(56, 92, 547)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 92, 547)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 20, 33)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (36, 72, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 36, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 36, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (2, 20, 33)-net over F16, using
(56, 92, 1374)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (56, 92, 1374)-net over F16, using
(56, 92, 718495)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 92, 718496)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 601 236811 203712 706782 412932 018015 827012 704656 326009 276296 494333 203083 919884 834559 428002 985731 921326 733523 546971 > 1692 [i]