Best Known (31, 93, s)-Nets in Base 16
(31, 93, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 93, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 93, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(31, 93, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 93, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 100, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 80, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 80, 120)-net over F32, using
(31, 93, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 93, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(31, 93, 3373)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 93, 3374)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 9641 575471 641963 830328 666050 459436 316140 344146 407474 339828 089840 516246 908387 187536 002326 339324 967679 617281 459536 > 1693 [i]