MinT - Best Known (65, 93, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (65, 93, s)-Nets in Base 16

(65, 93, 1045)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (65, 93, 1045)-net over F₁₆, using

generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (0, 9, 17)-net over F₁₆, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 16)-sequence over F₁₆, using
    - generalized Faure sequence [i]
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
      - the rational function field F₁₆(x) [i]
    - Niederreiter sequence [i]
2. digital (14, 28, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
      - generalized Faure sequence [i]
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
        the rational function field F₂₅₆(x) [i]
      - Niederreiter sequence [i]
3. digital (28, 56, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 28, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆ (see above)

(65, 93, 10243)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (65, 93, 10243)-net over F₁₆, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(65, 93, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (65, 93, large)-net in base 16, because

26 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 67, large)-net in base 16, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]