Best Known (24, 95, s)-Nets in Base 16
(24, 95, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 95, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 95, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(24, 95, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(24, 95, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 76, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
(24, 95, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (24, 95, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 95, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(24, 95, 1569)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 95, 1570)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 94, 1570)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 155212 457962 469482 112648 583905 012580 882400 360999 464877 693769 460588 935180 669469 463077 171061 899142 427855 261528 997376 > 1694 [i]