Best Known (25, 95, s)-Nets in Base 16
(25, 95, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 95, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 95, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(25, 95, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(25, 95, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 100, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 80, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 80, 76)-net over F32, using
(25, 95, 144)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (25, 95, 144)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 143)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
(25, 95, 1700)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 95, 1701)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 482703 517431 882420 420271 371606 645171 093049 092269 849407 873457 188259 775976 277868 190470 465785 669019 001406 773005 491276 > 1695 [i]