Best Known (49, 95, s)-Nets in Base 16
(49, 95, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 95, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (49, 96, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 48, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 48, 258)-net over F256, using
(49, 95, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (49, 95, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (49, 96, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 48, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 48, 289)-net over F256, using
(49, 95, 59130)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 95, 59131)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 463040 447593 563488 734001 083966 485180 739939 606729 755960 101366 317605 555806 325749 211026 080316 734655 080520 550086 311496 > 1695 [i]