Best Known (65, 95, s)-Nets in Base 16
(65, 95, 1032)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 95, 1032)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (65, 96, 1032)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (17, 32, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (33, 64, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (17, 32, 516)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(65, 95, 6862)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (65, 95, 6862)-net over F16, using
(65, 95, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 95, large)-net in base 16, because
- 28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 67, large)-net in base 16, but