Best Known (51, 96, s)-Nets in Base 16
(51, 96, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 96, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 48, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(51, 96, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (51, 96, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 98, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 49, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 49, 321)-net over F256, using
(51, 96, 95568)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 96, 95569)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 95, 95569)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 462704 336908 969745 795164 286925 044611 808234 198715 463083 488869 140610 660496 022055 937887 496324 717837 418136 773091 044896 > 1695 [i]