Best Known (58, 96, s)-Nets in Base 16
(58, 96, 538)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 96, 538)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 20, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (38, 76, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 38, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 38, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (1, 20, 24)-net over F16, using
(58, 96, 1319)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (58, 96, 1319)-net over F16, using
(58, 96, 641345)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 96, 641346)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 39 402775 033767 390945 871385 423002 410408 508586 540392 918839 785451 913715 272097 320356 336556 827096 345306 670530 363491 242336 > 1696 [i]