Best Known (67, 97, s)-Nets in Base 16
(67, 97, 1034)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (67, 97, 1034)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (67, 98, 1034)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (17, 32, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (17, 32, 516)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(67, 97, 8305)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (67, 97, 8305)-net over F16, using
(67, 97, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (67, 97, large)-net in base 16, because
- 28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (67, 69, large)-net in base 16, but