Best Known (23, 98, s)-Nets in Base 16
(23, 98, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 98, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 98, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 98, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (23, 98, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 98, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 98, 1381)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 98, 1382)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 97, 1382)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 646 866914 181680 631767 097278 259364 364304 529937 122621 431816 789361 964950 955739 442103 664665 330661 103630 018107 918999 451561 > 1697 [i]