Best Known (29, 98, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29, 98, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 98, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 98, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(29, 98, 104)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(29, 98, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 100, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 80, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 80, 104)-net over F32, using
(29, 98, 161)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (29, 98, 161)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 160)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
(29, 98, 2439)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 98, 2440)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 97, 2440)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 632 575640 747704 298521 206135 841223 348449 263022 948602 290685 804357 279586 240819 583470 202710 482301 950586 669702 771704 358276 > 1697 [i]