Best Known (51, 99, s)-Nets in Base 16
(51, 99, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 99, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 100, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 50, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 50, 258)-net over F256, using
(51, 99, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (51, 99, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 100, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 50, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 50, 289)-net over F256, using
(51, 99, 60558)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 99, 60559)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 161446 100354 573895 708555 108213 158031 061149 691489 162815 640947 693899 174783 880042 177118 099614 274646 585649 526179 434463 642616 > 1699 [i]