Best Known (69, 99, s)-Nets in Base 16
(69, 99, 1036)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 99, 1036)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (69, 100, 1036)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 34, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (19, 34, 518)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(69, 99, 10052)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (69, 99, 10052)-net over F16, using
(69, 99, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 99, large)-net in base 16, because
- 28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 71, large)-net in base 16, but