Best Known (169−10, 169, s)-Nets in Base 2
(169−10, 169, 4210686)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (159, 169, 4210686)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (25, 30, 16385)-net over F2, using
- digital (129, 139, 4194301)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 140, 4194301)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2140, 4194301, F2, 15, 11) (dual of [(4194301, 15), 62914375, 12]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2140, 4194301, F2, 15, 11) (dual of [(4194301, 15), 62914375, 12]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 140, 4194301)-net over F2, using
(169−10, 169, large)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (159, 169, large)-net over F2, using
- 217 times duplication [i] based on digital (142, 152, large)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (141, 152, large)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2152, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- 4 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2152, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (141, 152, large)-net over F2, using
(169−10, 169, large)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (159, 169, large)-net in base 2, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (159, 161, large)-net in base 2, but