Best Known (140, 140+10, s)-Nets in Base 2
(140, 140+10, 4194327)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 150, 4194327)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 11, 26)-net over F2, using
- digital (129, 139, 4194301)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 140, 4194301)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2140, 4194301, F2, 15, 11) (dual of [(4194301, 15), 62914375, 12]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2140, 4194301, F2, 15, 11) (dual of [(4194301, 15), 62914375, 12]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 140, 4194301)-net over F2, using
(140, 140+10, large)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (140, 150, large)-net over F2, using
- 210 times duplication [i] based on digital (130, 140, large)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 10), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 10), using
(140, 140+10, large)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 150, large)-net in base 2, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 142, large)-net in base 2, but