Best Known (29, 29+10, s)-Nets in Base 2
(29, 29+10, 72)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 39, 72)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 13, 24)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- the Klein quartic over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
(29, 29+10, 95)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (29, 39, 95)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(239, 95, F2, 2, 10) (dual of [(95, 2), 151, 11]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(239, 190, F2, 10) (dual of [190, 151, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(239, 191, F2, 10) (dual of [191, 152, 11]-code), using
- a “X†code from Brouwer’s database [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(239, 191, F2, 10) (dual of [191, 152, 11]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(239, 190, F2, 10) (dual of [190, 151, 11]-code), using
(29, 29+10, 573)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 39, 574)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 551524 708561 > 239 [i]