Best Known (231−101, 231, s)-Nets in Base 2
(231−101, 231, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 231, 66)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (130, 234, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 143, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(231−101, 231, 85)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (130, 231, 85)-net over F2, using
(231−101, 231, 402)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 231, 403)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (130, 230, 403)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1734 994748 689103 027662 946171 895644 702845 405360 618205 538760 842700 578268 > 2230 [i]