Best Known (260−101, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(260−101, 260, 84)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (159, 260, 84)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (158, 259, 84)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (54, 104, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 155, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (54, 104, 42)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(260−101, 260, 123)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (159, 260, 123)-net over F2, using
(260−101, 260, 635)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (159, 260, 636)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (159, 259, 636)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 979441 190544 353076 530705 057866 642932 587346 893773 148684 238494 046824 322332 716959 > 2259 [i]