Best Known (115, 115+101, s)-Nets in Base 2
(115, 115+101, 57)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (115, 216, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (110, 216, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 8 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(115, 115+101, 73)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (115, 216, 73)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 216, 73)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (114, 72)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 114 and N(F) ≥ 73, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (114, 72)-sequence over F2, using
(115, 115+101, 250)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (115, 216, 251)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (115, 215, 251)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2215, 251, S2, 100), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 257049 453189 140945 613695 781062 476077 678522 037899 401039 162840 762880 750568 603648 / 4 012062 840109 > 2215 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2215, 251, S2, 100), but