Best Known (118, 118+101, s)-Nets in Base 2
(118, 118+101, 57)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (118, 219, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (110, 219, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 8 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(118, 118+101, 73)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (118, 219, 73)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 219, 73)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (114, 72)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 114 and N(F) ≥ 73, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (114, 72)-sequence over F2, using
(118, 118+101, 259)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (118, 219, 260)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (118, 218, 260)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2218, 260, S2, 100), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1142 657488 817576 991675 233913 757847 770281 701964 551079 070743 947785 108476 991312 494592 / 2464 861605 749631 > 2218 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2218, 260, S2, 100), but