Best Known (143, 143+101, s)-Nets in Base 2
(143, 143+101, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 244, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 155, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F2, using
(143, 143+101, 101)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 244, 101)-net over F2, using
(143, 143+101, 495)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 244, 496)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 243, 496)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 783422 984192 431919 149099 538879 997883 379987 833130 367209 845840 543028 339676 > 2243 [i]