Best Known (232−102, 232, s)-Nets in Base 2
(232−102, 232, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 232, 66)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (130, 234, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 143, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(232−102, 232, 84)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (130, 232, 84)-net over F2, using
(232−102, 232, 394)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 232, 395)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7708 016625 700940 828776 386005 799759 449221 763131 746614 609993 499304 611824 > 2232 [i]