Best Known (234−103, 234, s)-Nets in Base 2
(234−103, 234, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (131, 234, 66)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (131, 237, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 145, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(234−103, 234, 85)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (131, 234, 85)-net over F2, using
(234−103, 234, 400)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (131, 234, 401)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (131, 233, 401)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14904 576056 489939 813483 273326 599295 405825 163266 119011 567607 949519 159136 > 2233 [i]