Best Known (250−103, 250, s)-Nets in Base 2
(250−103, 250, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (147, 250, 75)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (147, 255, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 162, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(250−103, 250, 104)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (147, 250, 104)-net over F2, using
(250−103, 250, 513)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (147, 250, 514)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (147, 249, 514)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 920 368644 538862 986568 224936 313151 701782 305591 347174 267698 301326 017237 490560 > 2249 [i]