Best Known (252−104, 252, s)-Nets in Base 2
(252−104, 252, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (148, 252, 75)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (148, 258, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 94, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 164, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 94, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(252−104, 252, 105)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (148, 252, 105)-net over F2, using
(252−104, 252, 508)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (148, 252, 509)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7465 378113 836617 664178 091920 531810 731224 867022 334350 386431 187469 617700 342571 > 2252 [i]