Best Known (136, 136+104, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136, 136+104, 67)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 240, 67)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (45, 149, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
(136, 136+104, 90)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 240, 90)-net over F2, using
(136, 136+104, 423)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 240, 424)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 889762 752135 042699 301329 522563 648619 619374 163324 895050 097307 578464 333512 > 2240 [i]