Best Known (132, 132+105, s)-Nets in Base 2
(132, 132+105, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (132, 237, 66)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (132, 240, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 147, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(132, 132+105, 84)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (132, 237, 84)-net over F2, using
(132, 132+105, 397)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (132, 237, 398)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (132, 236, 398)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 111914 906977 984508 426171 822492 872910 813622 187017 598994 599564 588945 025112 > 2236 [i]