Best Known (229−106, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−106, 229, 59)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (123, 229, 59)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (123, 231, 59)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 69, 17)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 16)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 16)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 162, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (15, 69, 17)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(229−106, 229, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (123, 229, 80)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (121, 229, 80)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 79)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 121 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 79)-sequence over F2, using
(229−106, 229, 266)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (123, 229, 267)-net in base 2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2229, 267, S2, 106), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 5463 389198 461980 719621 493892 918669 384263 874368 982752 322932 717321 849363 217518 690304 / 5 086453 978125 > 2229 [i]