Best Known (142−108, 142, s)-Nets in Base 2
(142−108, 142, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 142, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 142, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(142−108, 142, 28)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (34, 142, 28)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 142, 28)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 27)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 27)-sequence over F2, using
(142−108, 142, 46)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 142, 47)-net in base 2, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 134, 47)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2134, 47, S2, 3, 100), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 3 136042 293543 368879 278460 382091 175836 778496 / 101 > 2134 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2134, 47, S2, 3, 100), but