Best Known (256−108, 256, s)-Nets in Base 2
(256−108, 256, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (148, 256, 75)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (148, 258, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 94, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 164, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 94, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(256−108, 256, 101)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (148, 256, 101)-net over F2, using
(256−108, 256, 485)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (148, 256, 486)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 127566 131731 237068 342356 256780 166726 434599 143577 592946 607624 859100 612192 241536 > 2256 [i]