Best Known (152, 152+108, s)-Nets in Base 2
(152, 152+108, 76)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (152, 260, 76)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (59, 167, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
(152, 152+108, 106)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (152, 260, 106)-net over F2, using
(152, 152+108, 514)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (152, 260, 515)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 974525 245279 695365 242448 680731 474235 623380 986334 859891 772679 628220 659737 263744 > 2260 [i]