Best Known (257−112, 257, s)-Nets in Base 2
(257−112, 257, 69)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 257, 69)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 75, 20)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 182, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (19, 75, 20)-net over F2, using
(257−112, 257, 94)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (145, 257, 94)-net over F2, using
(257−112, 257, 444)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 257, 445)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 239231 978265 177505 526645 054780 652189 924908 764659 214909 544910 175311 640931 244695 > 2257 [i]