Best Known (251−115, 251, s)-Nets in Base 2
(251−115, 251, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 251, 66)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 252, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 97, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 155, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 97, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(251−115, 251, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 251, 82)-net over F2, using
(251−115, 251, 383)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 251, 384)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 250, 384)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2011 648414 095816 050943 112621 594183 345452 202937 924121 062525 154666 309156 353973 > 2250 [i]