MinT - Best Known (126, 126+13, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (126, 126+13, s)-Nets in Base 2

Digital (126, 139, 1398100)-net over F₂, using

net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2¹³⁹, 1398100, F₂, 13, 13) (dual of [(1398100, 13), 18175161, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2¹³⁹, 8388601, F₂, 13) (dual of [8388601, 8388462, 14]-code), using
  - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2¹³⁹, large, F₂, 13) (dual of [large, large−139, 14]-code), using
    - the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 8388609Â | 2⁴⁶âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [0,6], and minimum distance dÂ â‰¥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1Â =Â 14 (BCH-bound) [i]

Digital (126, 139, 1677720)-net over F₂, using

embedding of OOA with Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2¹³⁹, 1677720, F₂, 5, 13) (dual of [(1677720, 5), 8388461, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 5-folding [i] based on linear OA(2¹³⁹, 8388600, F₂, 13) (dual of [8388600, 8388461, 14]-code), using
  - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2¹³⁹, large, F₂, 13) (dual of [large, large−139, 14]-code), using
    - the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 8388609Â | 2⁴⁶âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [0,6], and minimum distance dÂ â‰¥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1Â =Â 14 (BCH-bound) [i]

There is no (126, 139, large)-net in base 2, because

11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 128, large)-net in base 2, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]