Best Known (229−131, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−131, 229, 54)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (98, 229, 54)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 229, 54)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 53)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 5 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 53)-sequence over F2, using
(229−131, 229, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (98, 229, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 229, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(229−131, 229, 200)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (98, 229, 201)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (98, 228, 201)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 467 349755 691709 001616 148889 915007 470282 527301 577888 763175 114401 539942 > 2228 [i]