Best Known (102, 102+133, s)-Nets in Base 2
(102, 102+133, 55)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 235, 55)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (100, 235, 55)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 6 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
(102, 102+133, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (102, 235, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 235, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(102, 102+133, 210)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 235, 211)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (102, 234, 211)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27872 348823 999644 945259 579814 542216 026922 636329 132093 621690 612521 472079 > 2234 [i]