Best Known (189−152, 189, s)-Nets in Base 2
(189−152, 189, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 189, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 189, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(189−152, 189, 30)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (37, 189, 30)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (36, 189, 30)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
(189−152, 189, 47)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 189, 48)-net in base 2, because
- 6 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 183, 48)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2183, 48, S2, 4, 146), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 2249 703453 991124 844070 053435 856653 881552 309031 365527 994368 / 147 > 2183 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2183, 48, S2, 4, 146), but