Best Known (259−160, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(259−160, 259, 54)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 259, 54)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 259, 54)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 53)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 5 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 53)-sequence over F2, using
(259−160, 259, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (99, 259, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 259, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(259−160, 259, 187)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 259, 188)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 014243 334362 464791 145498 032897 188686 855671 054347 644174 748904 799404 328397 174842 > 2259 [i]