Best Known (205−161, 205, s)-Nets in Base 2
(205−161, 205, 33)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 205, 33)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 205, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
(205−161, 205, 34)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (44, 205, 34)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (43, 205, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (43, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 43 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (43, 33)-sequence over F2, using
(205−161, 205, 58)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 205, 59)-net in base 2, because
- 37 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 168, 59)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2168, 59, S2, 3, 124), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 5986 310706 507378 352962 293074 805895 248510 699696 029696 / 15 > 2168 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2168, 59, S2, 3, 124), but