Best Known (68−19, 68, s)-Nets in Base 2
(68−19, 68, 72)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 68, 72)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (49, 69, 72)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 24)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- the Klein quartic over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 23, 24)-net over F8, using
(68−19, 68, 98)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (49, 68, 98)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(268, 98, F2, 2, 19) (dual of [(98, 2), 128, 20]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(268, 196, F2, 19) (dual of [196, 128, 20]-code), using
(68−19, 68, 709)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 68, 710)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (49, 67, 710)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 148 567345 379580 561128 > 267 [i]