Best Known (38, 38+195, s)-Nets in Base 2
(38, 38+195, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 233, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 233, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(38, 38+195, 30)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (38, 233, 30)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (36, 233, 30)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
(38, 38+195, 46)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 233, 47)-net in base 2, because
- 5 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 228, 47)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2228, 47, S2, 5, 190), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 84546 392748 184406 396075 759312 893561 792526 084909 087235 300740 921741 541376 / 191 > 2228 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2228, 47, S2, 5, 190), but