Best Known (260−207, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(260−207, 260, 36)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 260, 36)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 260, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
(260−207, 260, 40)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (53, 260, 40)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 260, 40)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 39)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 39)-sequence over F2, using
(260−207, 260, 64)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 260, 65)-net in base 2, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 252, 65)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2252, 65, S2, 4, 199), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 43422 033463 993573 283839 119378 257965 444976 244249 615211 514796 594002 967423 614976 / 5 > 2252 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2252, 65, S2, 4, 199), but