Best Known (104, 104+24, s)-Nets in Base 2
(104, 104+24, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 128, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 128, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 32, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 32, 65)-net over F16, using
(104, 104+24, 526)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (104, 128, 526)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2128, 526, F2, 2, 24) (dual of [(526, 2), 924, 25]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2128, 530, F2, 2, 24) (dual of [(530, 2), 932, 25]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(2128, 1060, F2, 24) (dual of [1060, 932, 25]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2128, 1061, F2, 24) (dual of [1061, 933, 25]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([1019,18]), C2 = C([1,20]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([1,18]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1019,20]) [i] based on
- linear OA(2111, 1023, F2, 23) (dual of [1023, 912, 24]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 210−1, defining interval I = {−4,−3,…,18}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(2100, 1023, F2, 20) (dual of [1023, 923, 21]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 210−1, defining interval I = [1,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- linear OA(2121, 1023, F2, 25) (dual of [1023, 902, 26]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 210−1, defining interval I = {−4,−3,…,20}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(290, 1023, F2, 18) (dual of [1023, 933, 19]-code), using the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 210−1, defining interval I = [1,18], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 19 [i]
- linear OA(26, 27, F2, 3) (dual of [27, 21, 4]-code or 27-cap in PG(5,2)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(26, 32, F2, 3) (dual of [32, 26, 4]-code or 32-cap in PG(5,2)), using
- linear OA(21, 11, F2, 1) (dual of [11, 10, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([1019,18]), C2 = C([1,20]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([1,18]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([1019,20]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2128, 1061, F2, 24) (dual of [1061, 933, 25]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(2128, 1060, F2, 24) (dual of [1060, 932, 25]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2128, 530, F2, 2, 24) (dual of [(530, 2), 932, 25]-NRT-code), using
(104, 104+24, 8579)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 128, 8580)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 340 501895 472408 059141 873797 421965 291424 > 2128 [i]